Skip to content

Renfroe Innovation — IP register

Purpose: Per-asset IP register for Renfroe Innovation, LLC. Cross- references accounting/renfroe-innovation-historical-ip-spend.md (the 13-year history of Conley Rose patent invoices) plus the entity profile in context/entities/renfroe-innovation.md.

Status: v1, 2026-05-10. Forward refresh as patent prosecution events occur.


Issued patents (Bar Management Software family — Conley Rose matter # 4447)

Patent # Title (general) Filing date Issue date Owner of record Status Next maintenance fee Notes
US 10,445,672 Bar Management Software family — patent 1 TBD TBD Renfroe Innovation, LLC Issued TBD Mat fees due at 3.5y / 7.5y / 11.5y from issue
US 10,445,819 Bar Management Software family — patent 2 TBD TBD Renfroe Innovation, LLC Issued TBD Same
US 11,900,288 Bar Management Software family — patent 3 TBD TBD Renfroe Innovation, LLC Issued TBD Same

Source for patent numbers: context/entities/renfroe-innovation.md, accounting/renfroe-innovation-historical-ip-spend.md. Filing dates, issue dates, and next maintenance-fee dates: pending refresh from Conley Rose's matter file (Michael W. Piper).


Pending applications

Application # Title (general) Filing date Status Next OA / response Owner of record Notes
Pending application (matter # 4447-00106) Bar Management Software family — additional claim TBD §101 Office Action since approximately Apr 2026 PAST DEADLINE as of 2026-05-09 — response/interview window expired Renfroe Innovation, LLC CRITICAL — Mandate 4 in accounting/xero-buildout.md §5. Conley Rose to confirm next steps (response, abandonment, or extension).

Trademark filings

Mark Serial # Filing date Status Owner of record Notes
RENFROE INNOVATION 85804994 2012 era NOA stage 2013-07-09 (published 2013-05-14, no oppositions) TBD Statement of Use (SOU) or registration certificate MISSING per legal/legal-document-inventory.md. Either Balch & Bingham (Pamela Smith — historical TM counsel) has it, or USPTO TSDR can confirm registration vs abandonment. Open follow-up.
CASA MOKSHA (Conley Rose matter # CR 8049-00100) 2026 In prosecution RHG (not RI — different matter / different counsel client) US filing → International Register → MX extension. Classes 039/041/043/044. Tracked separately under RHG, not RI.

Historical IP spend allocation

Per accounting/renfroe-innovation-historical-ip-spend.md: 13+ years of Conley Rose patent invoicing, mixed across RI / RFH / Austin personally over different periods.

Per accounting-policy §3 (capitalization) + §5.E (Renfroe Innovation revenue):

  • Patent prosecution costs through issuance: Capitalize as patent basis; amortize over 17-year statutory life (or remaining life) for tax purposes.
  • Maintenance fees post-issuance: Expense.
  • §174 R&D capitalization (TCJA effect): Costs incurred in developing the patented technology (R&D, not just patent prosecution fees) must be capitalized over 5 years (US R&D) or 15 years (foreign R&D) per TCJA §174 amendments.
  • Pre-1120S-conversion vs post-conversion: If RI was a C-corp through 2017 (with 8832 election preserving C-corp treatment) and then converted to disregarded SMLLC, IP basis carries over but the taxpayer changes from RI corporate to Austin personal. Affects whose return takes the deduction.

Open question (gates IP register treatment): Was Form 8832 filed at the 2017 Inc → LLC conversion electing C-corp continuation? If yes, RI was a separate taxpayer through some period (Conley Rose invoices billed to RI deduct at corporate level). If no, the prior S-election terminated by operation of law and Conley Rose invoices flow to Austin's 1040 (since RI defaulted to disregarded SMLLC).

This is context/contradictions.md-adjacent (open advisor question) but not strictly a contradiction — the answer is unknown, not contested.


Maintenance + license tracking

Maintenance fee schedule

Refresh from Conley Rose's matter file at next coordination:

Patent Issue date 3.5y fee 7.5y fee 11.5y fee
US 10,445,672 TBD TBD TBD TBD
US 10,445,819 TBD TBD TBD TBD
US 11,900,288 TBD TBD TBD TBD

Licensing status

  • Active licenses out: None documented.
  • Pending licensing conversations: None documented.
  • Licensing strategy: TBD with Austin. The Bar Management Software family could be licensed to bar / hospitality POS vendors (Revel — currently a Casa Moksha vendor — is a potential conversation, but not initiated).

Tax-treatment summary

Item Tax treatment Owner of book entry
New patent prosecution invoice (pre-issuance) Capitalize → patent basis Austin's 1040 (if RI disregarded) OR RI's 1120 (if 8832 C-corp election active)
Maintenance fee (post-issuance) Expense Same
§174 R&D cost (engineering / development of patented technology) Capitalize over 5 yr (US) / 15 yr (foreign) per TCJA Same
Trademark prosecution invoice Capitalize → trademark basis (15-yr §197 amortization on registration) Same
Trademark maintenance / renewals Expense Same
Future licensing royalty income Ordinary income (or §1235 capital gain if conditions met) Same
Future patent sale §1235 capital gain (if individual holder + holding period >1y) — but RI complicates the analysis Pearce + Kim & Rosado

Cross-references

  • accounting/renfroe-innovation-historical-ip-spend.md — 13-year billing history
  • context/entities/renfroe-innovation.md — entity profile
  • accounting/entity-tax-classification-matrix.md — RI row
  • legal/legal-document-inventory.md — RI document gaps (operating agreement, 1120S history, Form 8832, USPTO SOU)
  • tax/nol-preservation-ledger.md — RI patent prosecution cost effect on NOL absorption

Last updated: 2026-05-10. Refresh after Conley Rose coordination or at major prosecution events.